Does Trump Want Mass Deportation or Mass Incarceration?

I know it sounds like a loaded question. There’s a reason for that. Before we get to the answer, I want to focus on a few key Executive orders that President Trump has signed since entering office roughly forty days ago. We’ve experienced forty days and forty nights of media chaos, some warranted and some a bit too over the top.

As sensationalized as everything has gotten, there are some serious problems with the actions that our Commander in Chief is taking. To cut through some of the misconceptions, I want to outline the orders I’ll be tackling and highlight out the biggest problems with them.

Executive Order: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements

When it comes to immigration, the most publicized action that President Trump has taken was the enactment (and subsequent removal) of his so-called “Travel Ban.” However, it is his Executive Order focusing on border security that is extra alarming. To start, the purpose outlines the following:

“The recent surge of illegal immigration at the southern border with Mexico has placed a significant strain on Federal resources and overwhelmed agencies charged with border security and immigration enforcement, as well as the local communities into which many of the aliens are placed.”

This is misleading from the start, and we haven’t even gotten to the actions outlined in the order. While it’s true that a report released by the Department of Homeland Security in December does illustrate an increase in 2016 compared to 2015, the numbers are still lower than they were in 2014 or 2013. On top of that, net immigration from Mexico has been below zero for nearly a decade according to the Pew Research Center. That means more people are leaving than are coming in. In reality, Mexico isn’t even our biggest immigration challenge today.

Central Americans families and unaccompanied children fleeing poverty and violence have outnumbered illegal immigration from Mexico. This order also outlines the early work on building the supposed wall between the U.S. and Mexico. Of course, it is deaf to the fact that even law enforcement officials say that a physical wall is worse than a fence because law enforcement needs to be able to see the other side. Plus there’s the cost, but I digress.

Executive Order: Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking

This order, like most of the ones President Trump has signed, is more symbolic than it is tangible. It deals with an issue that seems to be stuck in the minds of many Americans. There is a pervasive fear that illegal immigrants are pouring over our border with the intent to form criminal trafficking organizations and committing mass amounts of crime. In reality, no study has ever linked immigration to crime. That doesn’t mean immigrants can’t be criminals, but it does mean that someone being an immigrant means absolutely nothing about whether or not they will be more or less likely to commit a crime. The order itself doesn’t seem to understand that.

“These groups are drivers of crime, corruption, violence, and misery.  In particular, the trafficking by cartels of controlled substances has triggered a resurgence in deadly drug abuse and a corresponding rise in violent crime related to drugs.”

It sure sounds scary when they say it like that in an official Executive Order, but Thomas Abt, a criminologist at the Harvard Kennedy School and the former Chief of Staff for DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs said the following: “Here in the United States, I think a connection between immigration—legal or illegal—and violent crime is not one that there’s any evidence for.”

In a recent memo, the DHS even established a new office. The Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office (VOICE) is to serve in creating a connection between the communities and citizens affected by this imaginary issue. I know that some people will cry foul because they’ve heard of some story in which an illegal immigrant committed a heinous act such as murder or rape. No one is disputing that or disputing that those violent criminals need to be removed from this country. No one. If someone tells you that all liberal Democrats want to pop open the borders and let those people in, they’re lying to you. Violent offenders need to be deported, and even President Obama was very crucial in doing that.

The issue with this order is that it is sensationalizing a problem that doesn’t exist. Violent crime is a problem. Immigration is a separate problem. Violent crime has no connection to immigration. Period. The end.

Executive Order: Preventing Violence Against Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Law Enforcement Officers

This may not seem related but bear with me. This specific executive order looks good and supportive of police on the surface, but in the text (and spirit) it undermines a major issue in law enforcement. There is progressively less trust between average Americans and law enforcement. On top of that, many members of the law enforcement community are increasingly on edge due to recent attacks against their fellow officers. I want to be clear that violence against law enforcement is never tolerable. There’s no excuse, and it’s never something that should be deemed “okay” by any stretch of the imagination.

However, that doesn’t mean that a “War on Cops” exists. In reality, line of duty deaths fluctuate from year to year but are still generally going down in recent years. They’ve gone up in 2016, but are still below the annual average over the last decade. Instead, it’s adding to the unrest and making community policing more difficult. There are several alarming sections of the order, but here are a few that stand out. The order seeks to “…pursue appropriate legislation, consistent with the Constitution’s regime of limited and enumerated Federal powers, that will define new Federal crimes, and increase penalties for existing Federal crimes, in order to prevent violence against Federal, State, tribal, and local law enforcement officers.”

It also specifies a decision to, upon review of current laws, “make recommendations to the President for legislation to address the protection and safety of Federal, State, tribal, and local law enforcement officers, including, if warranted, legislation defining new crimes of violence and establishing new mandatory minimum sentences for existing crimes of violence against Federal, State, tribal, and local law enforcement officers, as well as for related crimes.”

If you’re wondering what seems so wrong about that, then you may not realize how detrimental mandatory minimum sentences are. It was the use of mandatory minimum sentencing that aided in creating the era of mass incarceration when the War on Drugs took off. It takes the power of discretion away from judges and enforces harsh penalties when they may not be necessary. Combine this with the fact that the order outlines more potential laws regarding this, and it could be the bedrock for a new wave of mass incarceration. It might be a stretch to think that an order aimed at protecting law enforcement could lead to such issues. It could be abused in such a way to make it easier to arrest those who might not be the most friendly with law enforcement or trap them in situations in which that arrest is easier to justify. It wouldn’t be the first time a well-intentioned law was manipulated into injustice.

Removal of Obama Administration’s Memorandum on Reducing our Use of Private Prisons

This final point is a little more nuanced because it doesn’t deal with an order or memo from President Trump, but rather a decision by his administration to rescind one that was issued last August by the Department of Justice. In the memo, then Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates outlined the following:

“Private prisons served an important role during a difficult period, but time has shown that they compare poorly to our own Bureau [of Prisons] facilities. They simply do not provide the same level of correctional service, programs, and resources; they do not save substantially on costs; and as noted in a recent report by the Department’s Office of Inspector General, they do not maintain the same level of safety and scrutiny. The rehabilitative services that the Bureau provides, such as educational programs and job training, have proven difficult to replicate and outsource—and these services are essential to reducing recidivism and improving public safety.”

What’s so bad about Private Prisons?

I know this is a question a lot of people ask. I could just point back up a paragraph where the Department of Justice answered it, but I think it’s important to go a little deeper on why they’re a major issue. To start off, conditions are private prisons tend to be absolutely atrocious. Believe it or not, having good conditions for prisoners is actually a good thing. I’m sure some people are of the opinion that prisoners deserve the conditions they receive, but you have to remember that these prisoners are still people. They deserve to be treated like people, not animals.

On top of that, prisoners are expensive. Ideally, prisoners should spend a fair amount of time paying their debt to society for the crime they committed and then be released out into the world. The problem is that, after that release, most of those criminals have experienced so much emotional (and sometimes physical) trauma from the conditions they were subjected to that their likelihood of returning skyrockets. If people keep coming back to prison, they keep costing us money. Instead of wasting resources on private prisons that have fewer incentives to rehabilitate and are driven by a profit margin, it would be wiser to invest in programs that help keep criminals out of prison once their sentence is up.

This goes back to the issue of mandatory minimum sentencing, and economists have even suggested lengthy sentencing only works as a crime deterrent up to a certain point. There’s a threshold in which criminals start to become less concerned with the consequences of their actions. Pushing mandatory minimums will only end up raising the likelihood that someone will commit a crime again upon release. The companies that own private prisons would certainly prefer mandatory minimums because it helps guarantee them the profit from keeping their cells full.

An investigation into issues with private prisons conducted last year focused on one particular compound in Raymondville, TX. The Willacy County Regional Detention Center has been the subject of scrutiny for a few years now, and much of it began with the construction of the facility as a temporary holding center for immigrants awaiting deportation or transfer. Instead of being a traditional prison, it’s built entirely out of tents. The conditions are cramped, hot, stink, and the complex is severely understaffed. An article in Texas Monthly also outlined the major medical care issues within the complex:

In June 2009, Kathleen Baldoni, a former nurse at Willacy, testified before Congress during a briefing organized by Human Rights Watch to shed light on insufficient medical care provided in detention facilities across the country. “The level of human suffering was just unbelievable,” Baldoni testified. “There was inadequate food and personal items—personal hygiene was a problem—as was access to medical care.” According to the Texas Tribune, a 2007 review of Willacy’s medical facilities revealed that twenty of the center’s 46 health care positions were vacant at the time of the review, and the facility was without a clinical director, dentist, pharmacist, or psychiatrist. Baldoni told the Tribune in 2009 that detainees with health problems would be lucky to receive medical attention within a week. “We didn’t delve into anything that wasn’t absolutely necessary,” Baldoni told the Tribune. “After a while, you stop thinking about the people. You force yourself not to care as much. Because how else do you get the job done?”

On top of that, former guards have been charged with bribery and violating the civil rights of a person in custody. The combination of medical care failures and civil rights violations led to a massive riot in early 2015. In response to the riot, Willacy County filed a lawsuit late last year alleging that the private prison company that ran the facility caused the riot because of “abysmal management.” Low and behold, the county is now considering settling or even dropping the lawsuit because of renewed interest in the facility due to President Trump’s immigration actions.

Immigrants & Prisoners are People, Not Profit

It might sound like a “soft on crime” kind of opinion to insist on rights for prisoners. The truth is that every case is unique, and there are good people who find themselves in bad situations. There are good people who make poor decisions. There are also bad people who make terrible decisions and deserve the punishment they’ve been given, but if we want those offenders who can one day get out to stay out, something has to change.

Private prisons do not care about the conditions that their prisoners must endure. They care about their profit margins. In a scathing report by the ACLU, they found that “mass incarceration provides a gigantic windfall for one special interest group — the private prison industry — even as current incarceration levels harm the country as a whole.” Even Fox News outlined the benefits of incarceration, and specifically the imprisonment of immigrants, as a huge benefit to private prisons.

President Trump’s sudden arrival and decision to bolster both the private prison industry and broaden the powers of law enforcement to keep those prisons full fly in stark contrast to the fact that both crime and the prison population have actually been going down for years. That doesn’t mean crimes don’t still happen or that strides can’t be made to improve things, but it is dangerous to paint with such a broad, paranoid brush like President Trump does.

Silence is Complicity

I want to finally revisit a sentiment I introduced when I first decided to get political here. I first want to clarify that I am not so simplistic in believing that a lack of social media posts about a topic suddenly makes someone guilty. Silence can include refusing to stand up for those who are victimized or marginalized by actions or refusing to acknowledge such issues. Every person must decide for themselves how they feel they can make a difference. They have to decide for themselves how to stand up and push against injustice.

For me, this comes in the form of posting stories I’m passionate about on social media. It also includes this specific foray into the world of political journalism. These are issues that move me. These are stories in which the compassion and kindness within me are stirred to fight for those who can’t. That doesn’t mean everyone will choose the same avenue as me. Some may not find themselves comfortable pushing a public agenda on their social media because of their job or another position in their life. Others may just not enjoy using social media much.

Action can still be taken by being mindful of these issues and seeking to discuss them with friends and acquaintances they might be open to such discussions. That continues to raise awareness of the issues. Action can be taken in the form of peaceful protests to raise awareness. You could take the time to contact your congressman directly about an issue. Others might find they’ve been blessed with the ability to donate funds to causes. I often wish I had the chance to do that more, but everyone can get involved in their own way.

If You See Something, Say Something

Believe it or not, this old slogan has been around for nearly sixteen years now. It was actually created shortly after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, and since then it has become a rallying cry for transportation bureaus around the world. It’s even trademarked by New York City’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The slogan hasn’t exactly had major success, but the thought is nice. It’s simple. It’s catchy. If you see something suspicious, let the police know. Sounds great, right? Instead, the slogan has helped feed a “fear of the other” within the country. It’s led to calls to police that start with “I’m not racist, but” and go on to outline a person of color or potentially foreign looking person simply existing. You never want to discourage someone from calling the police in a real emergency, but what determines something being “suspicious” seems to have changed over the years.

Instead, the slogan has helped feed a “fear of the other” within the country. It’s led to calls to police that start with “I’m not racist, but” and go on to outline a person of color or potentially foreign looking person simply existing. You never want to discourage someone from calling the police in a real emergency, but what determines something being “suspicious” seems to have changed over the years.

For me, the slogan means something very different. When I see injustice, I can’t be silent. I’ve realized that over the past few years. That’s the whole reason I’m even writing this. Right now, I see President Trump making decisions that will directly impact the criminal justice system in a negative way, widen the divide between communities and law enforcement, and disproportionately target people of color and non-violent immigrants.

Most people insist that the actions on immigration will only target violent criminals, but we’ve already seen it affect a French Holocaust historian, a Jordanian with a valid U.S. Visa, a mother with years of immigration compliance and no violent history, and a father with a single non-violent conviction from 15 years ago. President Trump has been in office for a mere forty days. His immigration policies have been in effect for only a short time. This is just the beginning. In the end, Trump may indeed want mass deportation. Both of illegal and legal immigrants. For now, he clearly wants mass incarceration. With every action, he empowers the criminal justice system to pack their institutions to the brim and simultaneously line the pockets of the private prison industry.

Does Trump want mass deportation or mass incarceration? The answer is yes. It’s just a matter of time.

Why The Russian Connection Matters

“So what? What’s the big deal? Wouldn’t it be good if we got along with Russia?”

Those seem to be general responses I see in a lot of places when Russia gets brought up. It could be brushed off in favor of looking at other issues, but I believe the connection to Russia is crucial to understanding the way President-Elect Trump has acted.

It might look like him innocently trying to build foreign relations, but that’s just not enough. That could explain a few small actions, but the totality of the evidence makes it clear that there is more to this. If we’re not careful, we’ll see the Russian version of The Man in the High Castle get way too real. We’ll end up being The Soviet States of America.

As citizens who exercise our right to vote for a democratically elected leader, we have the right to expect them to put the interest of America first when making decisions. That’s Trump’s whole thing, right? America first? Why, then, does he appear more worried about cozying up to Russia than he is about healing wounds internally within the United States? It certainly seems like Trump is putting Russia first, and any manner of decisions made during his presidency using such a premise could be catastrophic for our nation.

What makes Putin so bad?

Okay, this one almost seems rhetorical, but I know some people really don’t see an issue here. We’ve had issues with Russia in the past, but that’s far from the only reason Putin is “not our friend” as even Fox News contributer Julie Roginsky explained.

Whether you agree the actions of Russia influenced the outcome of the election or not, the evidence shows that they were trying to tip the scales in favor of President-Elect Trump. They also sought to undermine our democratic process. Not just Russia in general, but Vladimir Putin himself was directly involved.

As Senator Marco Rubio outlined while questioning Rex Tillerson, the former ExxonMobil CEO who has been tapped as Trump’s Secretary of State, Vladimir Putin is a war criminal. His transgressions are vast, and his views and actions do not line up with American values. No good can come from this.

Some Lies About Russia

So, it often seems like President-Elect Trump’s favorite pastime is lying. He may like to call it “truthful hyperbole,” but I’m not interested in covering bullshit with a layer of political correctness. A lie, is a lie, is a lie. Now, let’s cover just four of the Russia-related lies.

Lie #1: At a campaign event, Trump said Putin “called [him] a genius.”

Truth: Putin called Trump “very flamboyant, very talented.” This was the way it was reported by Reuters, and basis behind the miscommunication seemed to be a bad translation. However, innocent as this one may seem, it shows Trump’s desire to believe Putin was complimentary to him.

Lie #2: On Twitter, said Russian hacking wasn’t brought up before the election.

Truth: So, this one is so baffling. Trump was essentially continuing to brush off claims about Russian hacking as if no one knew anything, but he also said, “why wasn’t this brought up before [the] election?” It’s an interesting question…since this was brought up before the election.

He was asked TO HIS FACE during the third presidential debate about the hacks. That’s because, even before the election, 17 intelligence agencies agreed that Russia was behind election-related hacking. This was also during his infamous “no puppet, you’re the puppet” retort where he tapped into his inner toddler and denied knowing Putin or having anything to do with Russia, the latter of which is also a lie.

Lie #3: Continued to claim “nobody knows” who was behind the election hacks. Because if you say it enough, it becomes true, right? WRONG.

Truth: I could just refer you to the above answer, but since this lie came later, I’ll go with the something slightly more recent. Only two days before Trump said again that nobody knows what happened, The Atlantic featured an in-depth article focusing on discussions with Congressman Adam Schiff about the reports they’d received before the election.

Lie #4: On Twitter, stated that intelligence indicated there was “absolutely no evidence that hacking affected the election results.”

Truth: This is one that some people might want to debate about. It is up for debate how much impact the actions had, and whether or not they actually tipped the scales. However, this was a specific statement that Trump gave immediately after meeting with the heads of the intelligence community. The actual report explicitly stated: ‘We did not make an assessment of the impact Russian activities had on the outcome of the election.’ So, that’s gonna be a straight up lie from the President-Elect.

Trump, Putin, and Twitter

Since Twitter continues to be the President-Elect’s favorite medium, let’s take a look at some of the things he’s said about Russian President Vladimir Putin. Believe it or not, he was not always a fan.

During the lead up to the 2012 Presidential Election, Trump was very vocal in his support of Mitt Romney. More accurately, he was vocal in his disapproval of President Obama.

To give some context, this was a time when Russia was increasing their influence in Syria to support the Assad regime. Today, the atrocities taking place in Syria continue to be a hotly debated issue. Trump seemed to show belief at the time that Russia needed to be taught a lesson, or at the very least dealt with in a stern manner.

This continued his desire to support Romney’s view on Russia, and criticize the actions that President Obama and his administration had taken in regards to Russia. This was the last time Trump mentions Putin for nearly a year, but everything appeared to change after Trump made a deal to bring the Miss Universe Pageant to Moscow.

From that point on, Trump’s tone regarding Putin tends to shift. He rarely says anything directly critical of Putin, and if he does there’s more spin on it criticizing President Obama. It’s almost as if he excuses every negative action Putin makes by laying blame on Obama for letting him.

This last tweet stands as an interesting excerpt showing Trump’s tendency to toss praise in the direction of Putin. The tweet came shortly after an episode of 60 Minutes that featured separate interviews with Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in the same episode.

Now, you might be wondering if they got to know each other as a result of this 60 Minutes episode. Luckily, Trump already answered that back in the Republican Presidential Debate in November of 2015.

“I got to know him very well because we were both on 60 Minutes, we were stablemates,” Trump said about the experience. Except…what was it he said in a later debate after he got over the “you’re the puppet” nonsense?

“Now we can talk about Putin. I don’t know Putin. He said nice things about me. If we got along well, that would be good.”

Is it just me, or do those statements not add up? Now, for clarification, there was no direct contact between Trump and Putin during the production of the 60 Minutes episode, contrary to the way he spoke about it. They were interviewed separately, but were featured on the same episode. The contradictions continue, as a report from Yahoo News today outlines a recently discovered audio tape from a radio show where Trump explicitly states that he has met Vladimir Putin.

President-Elect Trump’s on-again, off-again relationship with the truth muddies the waters between these comments. Going back to the original tweet, I’m curious as to why Trump chose to quote this specific tweet. I’m sure he had plenty of complimentary tweets to choose from, but he decided on the one that commended Putin, as well as Trump.

This last one is especially unsettling. It may seem like a simple jab at President Obama, but putting stock in Putin’s popularity is bothersome. More than a year later, Trump brought up Putin’s approval ratings during the Commander-in-Chief Forum hosted by Matt Lauer.

Putting any stock in these numbers is disturbing because of the nature of Russia’s relationship with the media. Freedom of the press does not exist in Russia. President Putin and his administration have a firm grip on the press and essentially silence any opinions that don’t support Putin.

This connects directly to the issues Trump has had with the media here, including his misunderstanding of the definition of “fake news,” scolding of reporters, desire to open up libel laws and threaten the First Amendment, and willingness to ban outlets that don’t agree with him.

The Russian Connection Matters

There is a vast array of evidence that President-Elect Trump’s connections and relationship to Russia and President Vladimir Putin have a lot more to them than he would like us to think.

Just today, Vladimir Putin came to Trump’s defense and dismissed claims from the recently released (though unverified) dossier that allege Russia has leverage on Trump and that they were in contact with his campaign. President Putin went even further and accused the Obama administration of attempting to “undermine the legitimacy” of President-Elect Trump.

Plus, since we’ll probably never see Trump’s tax returns, we’ll never know the extent of his business ties to Russia. Despite Trump’s claims that no one cares, we absolutely do care. As the days go by, Trump doesn’t ease concerns about conflicts of interest. He doesn’t calm tensions between an increasingly divided country. He doesn’t care.

There could be plenty of reasons that Trump wants to stay friendly with Putin. Trump could have a key relationship with Putin that he wants to pay back by creating policies favorable to Russia. He could literally be paying back Russia, or Putin, with his actions.

It is our job, as citizens, to hold him accountable. That includes not forgetting about his tax returns. That includes paying close attention to his connections with Russia and Vladimir Putin. I know it’s tempting to arrive at the “all smoke, but no fire” conclusion for some, but I’d much rather we find a way to put out the fire before Trump starts it. Especially if that fire is nuclear in nature.

If not, Trump gets his way. Putin gets his way. We’ll be the Soviet States of America. They’ll make the world “great again,” but chances are their definition of “great” isn’t one that we’re going to appreciate.

A billboard showing a pictures of President-elect Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is seen through pedestrians in Danilovgrad, Montenegro. REUTERS/Stevo Vasiljevic

Silence is Complicity

I’ve been going back and forth about this for months, but I’ve finally reached my breaking point. My platform is small, but I feel it’s my duty to use it as best I can. I vehemently oppose the President-Elect of the United States, and with every passing action, he solidifies himself as the most inept and dangerous individual to ever reach the highest office in our nation. When I see commercials advertising coverage of his inauguration this Friday, I feel sick to my stomach that such an atrocity is going to take place.

Now, as fair warning, a large chunk of this is going to be about my own political journey from growing up as a traditional conservative who voted straight party to a liberal democrat who has a few conservative views. If you’d rather skip to the meat of things, jump down to the section titled “Silence is Complicity.” If you want a little background, continue on from here.

Growing Up Republican

Before I get into specifics about the current state of things, I want to take a step back. I’ve gone through an ideological journey over the last few years, and the context of that I think will help put things into perspective. As a man who was born and raised in south Texas, it’s pretty much standard that I grew up as a traditional conservative republican. Those always seemed to stand as the “right values.” Liberal opinions and being a democrat all had these underlying stigmas, and it took me a long time to see through those.

I vaguely remember the election in 2008; I was only a Junior in High School at the time. I remember seeing classmates wearing John McCain shirts. I remember jokes about Sarah Palin. I remember Obama being called the Anti-Christ. I remember people saying he was just a good speaker and comparing him to Hitler. I was picking up the absurdly anti-Obama conservative undertones that would dominate the political conversation on the right for the next eight years.

I remember hearing so much frustration and off comments about Obama and what he was doing. I don’t remember him being referred to as President Obama. Instead, he was delegated to only his last name as if the office had no bearing on him. I don’t remember most people on the right giving him any modicum of respect, at least not in the way they’re insisting everyone does for President-Elect Trump now. Over the next few years, finishing up high school and my brief foray at the University of Houston, my political leanings almost didn’t exist. I had a few issues that I considered somewhat important, I always considered education to be important, but overall I just wasn’t informed enough or interested enough.

By the time 2012 rolled around, I was old enough to vote for the first time in a presidential election. I didn’t consider it a big thing, but mainly just something I was able to do finally. I made my way to the polls and did like anyone else raised like I was might have. I voted straight ticket Republican. That included Mitt Romney, who though I felt was boring, seemed like the better choice at the time. There was almost no basis or research behind that opinion, but Romney was the republican. As plain as he seemed, it felt like Romney was my only option. I’d been conditioned to see voting republican as the only thing that was right.

Now, I want to clarify that statement because it might sound really damning. I’m not saying there was some sort of conspiratorial brainwashing that turned me into a republican by default. My parents never forced or pressed me into believing things one way or another. If anything, I always felt curiosity was encouraged. I never felt that questioning something was off limits, and trying to understand why things were a certain way almost always came into play when I found an interest in something.

An Intro to Politics

That brings me to 2015. Up to this point, I’d considered myself a conservative. I was pretty stereotypical. Not radical, but predictable. I was a Christian conservative who thought his views were centrist. I took a few political tests here or there, but I never really paid too much attention. Throughout 2015, the build to the 2016 Presidential Election was already beginning to take hold. I started to pay attention to things a little more than I had in the past, and the more research I did the more my opinion began to change.

Something that definitely played a role in this is the fact that I work in law enforcement, especially when considering the police shootings and scrutiny in the last few years. I’d heard all sorts of things regarding this. The consensus from everyone on the right always seemed to be “just do what they say.” My frustration usually centered around the difficulty in discerning truth from complex situations. I’d often see a small chunk of video, and I know from work that there’s usually a lot more to it than that. I usually gave officers the benefit of the doubt, but I rarely got involved in the conversation. “I don’t like conflict,” I’d think to myself. “I don’t feel like arguing about it,” I’d rationalize.

The reality was that I’d never dug deep enough to develop strong opinions and stances on the issues. I’ve always been very cautious to throw my support behind something unless I know it well. This applies to pretty much everything in life, but I’ll give a simple example. You know how superheroes became cool again, and suddenly there is Marvel and DC apparel everywhere? Very little of that I’d ever buy, because I don’t consider myself knowledgeable enough on the subject matter. If I’m wearing a Batman t-shirt, I would expect myself to know more than just a few movies and the basics. In order to consider wearing a Green Lantern hat, I’d have to be pretty well versed in his comics. I usually won’t even buy clothing for a band unless I’ve seen them live.

I know that sounds random, but it ties back in. I know this is something that sets me apart and a lot of people are happy to toe the party line without getting too deep into the specifics of everything. Once I started to dive deep into some issues, the picture looked a lot different than I’d expected. Seeing the stances that so many Republicans have taken in terms of education was always very jarring. Shifts towards “school choice” and all these other buzz words that were, in reality, just gutting schools of funding and usually muddying the waters with unrelated talk to disguise that.

I began to see how voices on the right seemed so determined to push the narrative that there was a “war on police.” Now, the tragedies we’ve seen in Dallas, Baton Rouge, and elsewhere can’t go without mention. They were disgusting acts, but the reaction to them didn’t make sense. There was so much anger and hatred for the actions, but it was being pointed at groups like Black Lives Matter. I understood that people wanted justice, but the men who committed those heinous acts had justice done to them that day. Neither lived to see the next morning, and there is no question that lethal force was justified in those circumstances.

Racism & Implicit Bias

Yet, the anger seemed more broad. Somehow people were shaping a narrative where this was some sort of African American war on law enforcement. That didn’t make sense to me, and the deeper I dug the less credible opinions like that became. Meanwhile, I would see stuff question why there was Black History Month but not a White History Month. People talking about how if white people are proud it’s racist, but if black people do it it’s okay. It always sounded sort of silly to me, but there so so much more at work in those seemingly pointless comments than I ever realized.

It was around this time that I really became aware, and more knowledgeable, of the issues of systemic racism and implicit bias. To me, for a long time, racism was always a really radical concept. It was a term reserved for the most blatant of radicals. The people who spout the n-word like it’s a casual insult like “idiot.” The ones who make comments about “their kind” sticking with each other. These more obvious verbal aggressions that, to me, were clearly fueled by a feeling a racism.

Those aren’t the biggest issues creating a racial divide and preventing racial equality. Instead, they’re just the most obvious ones. It feels like white people, and especially white people on the right, of which I used to be one, are always terrified of being branded as a racist. Yet, most of the people who react in that way exhibit several microaggressions that show their bias. Unfortunately, they’re bothered by the thought of holding such bias that they refuse to even admit that an issue exists. All my life, I’d heard little things like “he’s one of the good ones.”

I’d heard people say they “don’t date black guys,” but they’d immediately follow it up with a “but I’m not racist.” Clue number one. If you feel like you have to add a “but I’m not racist” qualifier to the end of the statement, your gut instinct is probably telling you that it’s a racist statement. Deal with that, don’t cower from it. If you think you’re incapable of racism because you “don’t see color” or “have a black friend,” you need to take a step back and think about that. You shouldn’t have to create reasons that you aren’t a racist. If you aren’t, you know it.

If you’re too scared of the word “racist,” focus on implicit bias. Basically, you’ve had enough opinions seep into your mind over time that, whether you realize it or not, you’re making snap judgments that have to do with some underlying prejudice. Then there’s systemic racism, where you have an extension of the times of Jim Crow and slavery that have found their way into new institutions and parts of society and continue to hold down people of color.

Now here’s the real trick. If you’re at this point, and you’re suddenly angry and feel like I’m calling you a racist, take a deep breath cowboy. Everyone suffers from implicit bias. Regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or origin, implicit bias is always at play. Facing that doesn’t make you a bad person. On the contrary, it’s good to admit. Once you become aware of it, you can look for it in your daily thoughts and actions. That lets you begin to prevent it, see it in others, and move forward.

You’re telling me Trump is a conservative?

All of this led me to question some traditional opinions on the right that didn’t seem to fit with everything I was beginning to understand. Issues like opposing gay marriage, being pro-life, supporting family values, these were all things that I’d traditionally applied to the republican party. Yet, some of them really fell apart as the election got rolling. When I started to dig in deep, I was focused on the republican primary. I was interested enough to attend a primary election and cast my ballot for Marco Rubio.

I knew he was a longshot by that point in the primary, but I stuck with it. I’d really leaned towards John Kasich, but he was so far behind that even a comeback was out of the realm of possibility. Ted Cruz wasn’t someone I was a huge fan of, but I didn’t see him as a bad person. Then there was Donald Trump. Yep, we’ve arrived. Like many other people, I didn’t take Donald Trump’s campaign seriously. At first, it seemed like a publicity stunt. As the race began to narrow, things became more and more alarming.

By the time he had become the party’s nominee, I was basically just standing back in utter confusion. I was baffled. How had a system allowed him to become an official party’s nominee? How had people actually voted for him? His base of support got louder, and people started talking about Republicans coming home to the party and standing behind Trump for the good of the GOP. Meanwhile, it felt like his insanity was being normalized. I saw a select few voices steer clear of him, but eventually, even Ted Cruz, whose wife had been insulted by Trump, decided he would look past everything and support the nominee.

When I say “look past everything,” it seems like a lot of people don’t grasp just how much “everything” is referring to. Before I get into the usual argument that ensues where someone brings up Hillary and her emails, I’m going to focus on Donald J. Trump. Let’s remember some of the many things this man has done that should disqualify him from holding the job. I’d cover all of them, but we’d be here all day.

First, there are the lies. Sure, politicians lie. I hear you, but Trump lies more often, more obviously, and more spectacularly. A few things he said that are factually untrue: said he opposed the Iraq War before the invasion, implied that the Clintons murdered Vince Foster, talked about Ted Cruz’s father being involved with JFK’s assassination, posted an absurd Breitbart article that implied President Obama had supported ISIS, shared inaccurate murder statistics that black-on-white homicides largely outnumber white-on-white homicides, continued to say the Central Park Five were guilty despite DNA evidence proving otherwise, blatantly lied in a debate about a tweet he’d posted in the middle of the night telling people to check out a sex tape, and that’s just scratching the surface.

His most prominent lie was the birther controversy where he continued to push the baseless claim that President Obama wasn’t born in this country. Let me be very clear. Birtherism is racism. I’m not the first to say this, but it’s important to keep repeating. When the facts started to fall apart, Trump resorted to saying President Obama was Muslim. Which, first of all, there is nothing wrong with, and second of all, is also blatantly wrong. He used his ability to invade the media to push racism, islamophobia, and only widen the racial divide in our country.

The irony is not lost when Trump begins to scream and moan like a baby on Twitter because the legitimacy of his own presidency is being called into question. I haven’t even mentioned the mistreatment of women, the numerous sexual assault allegations, the disparaging comments about Mexicans, the condescending views on the African-American community, his ridiculously thin skin, his lack of knowledge about our nuclear arsenal, oh and “grab ’em by the pussy.” Don’t forget about that little gem.


Silence is Complicity

I appreciate you getting this far, because if you did you are genuinely interested in what I have to say. Some of this might seem random, but it being the first time I’ve really entered this realm of the journalistic spectrum, I felt like I needed to get down to brass tacks this time. I doubt things will get this long in the future because there will be less to clarify. For now, this provides the context behind things. Now, it’s time to get blunt.

“You can’t believe the news,” I hear someone yelling from the ether. Let me squash that one real quick. This manufactured hatred of “political correctness” and “liberal media” is complete and utter horseshit. All media involves bias. All words involve bias. Life involves bias. However, facts are not biased. Daniel Patrick Moynihan once famously said, “you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.”

The growth of far-right websites such as Breitbart that lean so far to one side they lose most of those facts in their agenda has created what some have called a “post-truth era.” I’ve got a little optimism left, and I hope we can recover from this, but the sentiment sticks. The infection of true “fake news,” where a website creates an intentionally false story with no basis in truth whatsoever and gives it a provocative headline, has spread like wildfire amongst social media. Facebook seems hardest hit, but it’s definitely not the only place it’s happening.

The average user seems something unbelievable, hits share, and the chain reaction causes these absurd baseless reports to be misinterpreted as actual journalism. This is eroding the nature of true journalistic integrity, which has sadly been under attack by President-Elect Trump even more in recent days. From his childlike shouting match at a press conference in refusing to give CNN a single question, topped off with his “you are fake news” quip, to his equally baseless tweets, the man who will, unfortunately, become the 45th President of the United States in a few days is eroding the very fabric of democracy.

How he continues to be surprised when he’s criticized is beyond me. Presidents have been under the microscope for decades. This isn’t exactly new. What is new, however, is the grade school antics which he uses in response to most things. With every single move he makes, Trump continues to prove himself unfit for the office he will soon occupy. He continues to leave himself open to massive conflict of interest. He even felt it appropriate to attack a civil rights icon, Rep. John Lewis. Why? Because he hurt Trump’s feelings.

It’s the latest in a series of appalling actions taken by this man. We’ve also got his odd infatuation with Vladimir Putin and inability to realize the atrocities Putin has been party to which, combined with the unconfirmed reports that Russia could have compromising information on him, makes it feel like we’re becoming the Soviet States of America.

It is for these reasons, and so many more, than I am compelled to speak out. I am compelled to step out from the shadows and use my voice as best I can. It started with questioning things, led to sharing articles on Facebook, evolved into adding my own opinion as I shared those articles, and has finally arrived here. Rather than using the words of others, it’s time I used my own. I cannot remain silent, for silence is complicity.

If you choose to sit by and remain silent in the face of oppression, you are also guilty. If you choose to ignore issues when your fellow man is in dire need of help, you are also guilty. If you see injustice and refuse to fight it, you are also guilty. If you stood behind and supported an irredeemable candidate only because you disliked his opponent, you are also guilty.

If you have fallen into any of those categories, it’s never too late to step up. It’s never too late to face the flaws and hold him accountable for his actions. The election is over. Regardless of Russia’s influence, it’s done with. No matter how much I wish the outcome could have been different, it’s set in stone. Donald J. Trump will be the 45th President of the United States this Friday, but I will speak out as loud as I can from the first day of his presidency to the last. I will do what I can to hold him accountable.

You can too, even if you used to support Trump. This isn’t about punishing people for their votes. This isn’t about any of the things you might worry it is, but instead it’s exactly what it appears to be. An authoritarian bigot is getting ready to occupy the greatest office in our land, he’s putting his daughter in the White House as if she’s the First Lady (the same daughter he seems to have a little too much affection for), and he’s cozying up with the Russia while angering other countries 140 characters at a time.

This is only the beginning. Trump says he wants to “Make America Great Again,” but the truth is that he wants to control America. He wants it to love him, and that’d be something great in his mind. I refuse to normalize this monstrosity. I refuse to provide him respect by default due to the position he holds, in the same way that so many refused to provide respect to President Obama, a dignified family man, when he actually deserved it.